INTERCULTURAL PROFILE OF MANAGERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TROMPENAARS AND HAMPDEN-TURNER THEORY OF CULTURAL DIMENSIONS

Authors

  • Angela PIRLOG university lecturer, researcher, Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2021.2-06

Abstract

This paper is focuses on the intercultural side in the management of enterprises in the Republic of Moldova. It aims to identify and analyse the cultural characteristics of managers with business experience in enterprises in various branches of the Republic of Moldova economy and students enrolled in economic studies, potential future managers. The survey conducted in 2020 and 2021 was based on the culture model of Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner that includes seven dimensions: universalism versus particularism, individualism versus communitarianism, neutral versus affective, specific versus diffuse, achievement versus ascription, sequential versus synchronous time, inward direction versus outward direction. The main purpose of the study is to establish the ”national profile" of the Republic of Moldova, which was developed based on information collected from two segments of respondents: managers and students pursuing economic studies.

The results of the study showed that the "national profile" of the Republic of Moldova is characterized by particularism, individualism, neutrality with interconnected personal relationships, with the assignment of status in accordance with personal achievements, consistent temporal orientation and internal control of the environment. In turn, the knowledge of national characteristics can also determine the influence of intercultural management of Moldovan enterprises. Based on the identified cultural characteristics, the basic principles of management (behavioural and relational) were determined, contributing to the reduction of cultural differences both in Moldovan business at national and international level - for foreign enterprises in the Republic of Moldova. To increase the effectiveness of intercultural interaction, the study of the cultural environment from the point of view of the identified parameters will contribute to the selection of the most efficient management methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, N. J., & Gunderson, A. (2008). International dimensions of organizational behavior (5th ed). Thomson/South-Western.

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Cottle, T. J. (1968). The location of experience: A manifest time orientation. Acta Psychologica, 28, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(68)90009-7

Covas, L., & Pirlog, A. (2019). The Importance Of National Culture Dimensions On Intercultural Competence Development Of Future Managers. CrossCultural Management Journal, 2, 111–119.

David, D. (2015). Psihologia poporului român: Profilul psihologic al românilor : într-o monografie cognitiv-experimentala.

Huang, J. (2020). Intercultural Management as a Powerful Business Tool. În J. Huang, Sino-German Intercultural Management (pp. 9–26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38763-1_2

Jacob, N. (2005). Cross‐cultural investigations: Emerging concepts. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(5), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510614986

Management Association, I. R. (Ed.). (2014). Cross-Cultural Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4979-8

Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed). Allyn and Bacon.

Pîrlog, A. (2017). Analysis of the Dimensions of National Culture in the Republic of Moldova According to Fons’ Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner’s Model. Vol.1, 161–165. https://ibn.idsi.md/vizualizare_articol/58284

Romani, L., Barmeyer, C., Primecz, H., & Pilhofer, K. (2018). Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms*. International Studies of Management & Organization, 48(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2018.1480918

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976

Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.08.005

Trompenaars, A., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2020). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business.

Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (2. ed., repr. with corrections). Brealey.

Downloads


Abstract views: 132

Published

2021-12-21

How to Cite

PIRLOG, A. (2021). INTERCULTURAL PROFILE OF MANAGERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TROMPENAARS AND HAMPDEN-TURNER THEORY OF CULTURAL DIMENSIONS. Economy and Sociology, (2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2021.2-06