LONGITUDINAL METHOD APPROACH IN ASSESSING

THE MOLDOVAN MIGRANT STOCK



DOI: https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2023.1-03

JEL classification: F22, J10, J11, O15

UDC: 314.15(478)



Vitalie ȘTÎRBA,

Scientific Researcher, National Institute for Economic Research, Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova

PhD student, Department of Demography and Geodemography, Charles University, Czechia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-6509

e-mail: [email protected]

Andrei CRIVENCO,

PhD in Geography, Associate Professor, Shevchenko Pridnestrovian State University, Moldova

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3096-6979

e-mail: [email protected]



Received:  12 January 2023         

Accepted for publication: 18 May 2023



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was carried out within the project 20.80009.0807.21 ”Migration, demographic changes and situation stabilisation policies”, 2020-2023.

SUMMARY

Estimating international migration is a challenging exercise despite the information technologies used, regular censuses conducted, and available advanced administrative systems in collecting data on vital events. Recent works estimated the stocks and flows of Moldovan migrants mainly by using national administrative sources on population counts and data from the population censuses in the destination countries. This study aims to assess the stock of Moldovan migrants of the 1980–1995 birth cohorts, for which a longitudinal method was applied. Thus, we compared the de facto population of the corresponding generations to their initial size, adjusting by survival rate. The results show the existing stock of Moldovan migrants of the 1980–1995 year of birth and the impact of outmigration on the changes in the size of the corresponding cohorts as of 2016 and its trend until 2022. During the analysed period was emphasised a plateau in the migrant stock of the generations born in the early 1980s with a moderate return migration in the 2020–2022 period. On the other hand, the cohorts of the late 1980s and 1990s registered a significant increase in the number of migrants, which corresponds with the period of the entrance in high migration mobility ages. The study covers the entire territory of Moldova, including the left bank of the Nistru River and Bender municipality. The methodological part provides a complete description of the method applied, which might be further considered for estimating the migrant flows and stocks by using vital statistics or population census data. 

Keywords: migrant stock, cohort study, outmigration, Moldova, population dynamics, net migration

Estimarea migrației internaționale rămâne a fi un exercițiu complex chiar și în contextul disponibilității unui spectru larg de instrumente, precum recensămintele populației, resursele administrative de evidență a populației și tehnologiile informaționale avansate. Studiile recente au estimat stocul și fluxurile migranților moldoveni folosind datele naționale și din țările de destinație al statisticii migratorii și al recensămintelor populației. Acest articol are ca scop evaluarea stocului de migranți moldoveni din cohortele 1980–1995, pentru care a fost utilizată metoda de analiză longitudinală. Astfel, în cadrul studiului a fost comparată populația de facto a generațiilor corespunzătoare cu mărimea inițială a cohortelor, ajustată la rata de supraviețuire. Rezultatele studiului prezintă stocul existent de migranți moldoveni născuți în 1980–1995 și impactul emigrației asupra schimbărilor în dimensiunea generațiilor corespunzătoare pentru perioada 2016–2022. În perioada analizată s-au evidențiat schimbări minore în stocul de migranți ale generațiilor născute la începutul anilor 1980, care înregistrează valori moderate ale migrației de reîntoarcere, în special pentru perioada 2020–2022. În același timp, cohortele născute la sfârșitul anilor 1980 și 1990 au evidențiat o creștere semnificativă a numărului de migranți în perioada studiată, ceea ce se datorează vârstelor de mobilitate migratorie ridicată al acestora. Studiul acoperă întreg teritoriul Moldovei, inclusiv malul stâng al râului Nistru și municipiul Bender. Partea metodologică a lucrării oferă o descriere completă a metodei aplicate, care poate fi utilizată în contextul estimării longitudinale a fluxurilor și stocurilor de migranți prin utilizarea statisticilor vitale sau a datelor recensământului populației.

Cuvinte cheie: stoc de migranți, studiu de cohortă, emigrare, Moldova, dinamica populației, migrație netă

Оценка международной миграции нередко бывает затруднительной, несмотря на доступных для этого современный информационных технологий, проводимых регулярных переписей населения и качественного учета населения. Административные источники учета пересечений государственной границы, а также переписи населения, в том числе и в странах проживания мигрантов. В данной статье дается оценка численности молдавских мигрантов из когорт рожденных в 1980–1995 гг., для которых сравнивалась фактическая численность населения поколений с их исходной численностью, корректируемая по показателю выживаемости. Результаты исследования показывают текущую численность молдавских мигрантов 1980–1995 годов рождения и влияние эмиграции на изменение численности соответствующих когорт по состоянию на 2016 г. и ее динамику до 2022 г. В течение анализируемого периода, поколения родившиеся в начале 1980-х гг. регистрировали незначительный рост и умеренную возвратную миграцию в 2020–2022 гг. В то же время, когорты конца 1980-х и 1990-х гг. показывали значительный прирост численности мигрантов, что является следствием вступления соответствующих поколений в возраста с высокой миграционной мобильностью. Исследование охватывает всю территорию Молдовы, включая территории Левобережья Днестра и муниципий Бендер. В методологической части статьи дается полное описание применяемого метода, который может быть в дальнейшем использован для оценки потоков и численности мигрантов с использованием данных статистики естественного движения населения или переписи населения.

Ключевые слова: контингент мигрантов, когортный анализ, эмиграция, Молдова, динамика численности населения, нетто-миграция


INTRODUCTION

During the last decades, migration was the main reason for the population decline in Moldova, ultimately affecting other demographic phenomena. Consequently, outmigration caused an exodus of the labour force and depopulation, especially in rural areas, contributing to a population structure deterioration and accelerating the ageing process (Gagauz et al., 2023; Crivenco & von Löwis, 2022).

From the end of the 1980s until the mid-1990s, migration flows from Moldova included mainly ethnic minorities of Jews, Russians, Ukrainians, etc., who were involved in the process of repatriation to the countries of their origin (Tabac & Gagauz, 2020; Dietz, 2000). However, a pronounced outmigration from Moldova was registered since the end of the 1990s, which was mainly driven by the economic crises of 1998, when, in most cases, the decision to migrate was a response to high poverty in Moldova and emerging opportunities in the receiving countries (CIVIS & IASCI, 2010). Initially, the main destinations of the Moldovan migrants were CIS and EU countries (Piracha & Saraogi, 2012), while since the mid of 2010s, migration flows from Moldova have been predominantly to European countries (Tabac, 2021). Moldovan migrants initially opted for a determined period of stay in receiving countries, during which many migrants had an incentive for financial resource accumulation to improve their living conditions and cover current household spending. During the last decades, Moldovan migrants have opted for both seasonal and long-term migration (Görlich & Trebesch, 2008), depending on the destination country. Contrary to the above, migration became a life strategy for the younger generations, who consider early migration and social integration by obtaining higher education and vocational skills in the receiving countries.

Generally, emigration from Moldova is highly age-selective, involving the young and working-age population. Considering the settlement of Moldovan families in the countries of destination, there is an increase in the number of children migrating (Tabac, 2021). On the other hand, a positive net migration is observed among the population above 50, which is primarily involved in return migration.

During the years of independence of Moldova, outmigration has become an integral part of the public and socio-economic spheres of the state, shaping the patterns of the population’s economic, social, institutional, and political behaviour (Barsbai et al., 2017), at the same time contributing to economic development through remittances, transfer of know-how and investment, and changes in the population’s social values (Tabac & Gagauz, 2020).

The presented research aims to evaluate Moldova’s long-term international net migration of the 1980–1995 generations. For this, the 2015–2022 1st January population of the corresponding cohorts were compared to their initial size (number of births) adjusted by survival rate. The study results are based on a longitudinal approach and emphasise the long-term net migration of the analysed cohorts as of 2016 and its trend until 2022. The study covers the entire territory of Moldova, including the left bank of the Nistru River and Bender municipality.

The study uses a new approach to studying international migration in Moldova by comparing the de facto population with the size of the corresponding cohorts. The method used might be further applied to countries with distorted population statistics and disrupted series of annual migration flows.

LITERATURE OVERVIEW

Migration is a demographic event, the reliable record of which is challenging even in countries with accurate population statistics. Generally, the migrant stocks and flows are often measured using population censuses, which collect information on population ethnicity and place of birth (Abel, 2013). Additionally, data from population censuses could be combined with administrative sources (Raymer et al., 2007). The article by Beer and colleagues describes the method of migration harmonisation when the administrative data on migration flows is available in both destination and origin countries (Beer et al., 2010). Therefore, a set of methods for estimating migration flows are also comprehensively described in the articles by Abel & Cohen (2019) and Azose & Raftery (2018). In recent times, social media platforms have been utilised to estimate the number of migrants through monitoring groups of expats and tracking migrants based on their place of birth, professional experience, and place of residence (Zagheni et al., 2017; Vieira et al., 2022).

Generally, migration is a highly selective (Rogers, 1981) and repetitive (Aude, 2017) process, which shapes the population structure and reflects on other demographic events in both origin and destination countries (Alho, 2008). In this regard, a longitudinal approach in migration studies allows for assessing the cumulative effect of the migration on changes in the cohort sizes. An eloquent example is the study by Kashnitsky, which assessed changes in the cohorts due to internal migration in central Russia (Kashnitsky, 2020). Moreover, the article by Willson and colleagues measured the impact of migration on birth cohort sizes in European countries (Wilson et al., 2013). However, these studies rely on net migration as their basis and ignore the step migration.

An estimation of the Moldovan migrant stock was made by Tabac, where the studies were based on population censuses and administrative sources in Moldova and receiving countries. According to the results presented, during the 2001 and 2011 census rounds in receiving countries, the Moldovan migrant stock was estimated at 338 thousand and 657 thousand, respectively (Tabac & Gagauz, 2020). On the other hand, based on data from population censuses, population registers, and national representative surveys, the United Nations Population Division estimates the 2020 migrant stock originated from Moldova at 1.1 million (United Nations, 2020).

In conditions of distorted population statistics, to adjust the population structure, Penina and colleagues estimated the stock of Moldovan migrants by using administrative data on border crossings from the population register, where is concluded that about 18% of the total population in 2014 were emigrants who did not live in Moldova (Penina et al., 2015). A similar approach in using data on border crossings from the population register was used by Gagauz, where the estimated net migration for the 2005–2013 period was 363 thousand (Gagauz, 2023). Ultimately, this method is used by the NBS for vital statistics evidence.

DATA AND METHODS

Using data on birth counts and age- and sex population with usual residence, we estimated the Moldovan migrant stock as of 1st January 2016 and its trend until 2022. In the method used, we subtract the number of usual resident population on 1st January from its initial cohort size. To eliminate the effect of mortality, the life table probabilities of survival were applied. Thus, the arithmetic difference between the expected and de facto 1st January population corresponds with the estimated migrant stock. The research includes the entire territory of Moldova, including the left bank of the Nistru River and Bender municipality.

The data on birth counts of the studied cohorts were retrieved from the NBS. The age- and sex population distribution were obtained from NBS and, by request, from the Transnistrian Statistical Office. Considering that in the Transnistrian region, the vital statistics include the permanently absent population, we adjusted its age- and sex structure according to net migration rates calculated based on data from the Moldovan Border Police.

To adjust the cohort size by survival rate, we used life tables of the generations of the corresponding year of birth calculated by Penina and colleagues (Penina et al., 2015).

Figure 1 shows the Lexis diagram that reveals the applied method, where: (1) c is the hypothetical cohort born in the year t; and (2) ct1,x1 and ct2,x2 are the population stocks of cohort c on 1st January of the years t1 and t2 at the age x1 and x2. To exclude the effect of mortality on the generations studied, we adjusted the birth cohort size by survival rate.

Figure 1. The Lexis chart shows the method of estimation of the net migration within the hypothetical cohort c born in year t on 1st January of years t1, t2 at age x1, x2

The estimation of the net outmigration of the 1980–1995 birth cohorts is made according to the following formula:

;

where (1) ct is the initial cohort size; (2) px1,t1 is the probability of surviving from birth to the age x1,t1; and (3) Pt1,x1 is the population of the respective cohort ct on the 1st of January of the year t1.

Table 1 illustrates the applied method of Moldovan migrant stock estimation. There is revealed the initial cohort size of the studied generations, the probability of their survival to 1st January 2016, and the population with usual residency of the corresponding cohorts.

Table 1. Illustration of the method of estimation of migrant stock by using cohort size, probability of survival, and population with usual residency

Year of birth

(1)

Cohort size

(2)

Probability of survival to 1st January 2016

(3)

Population with usual residency on 1st January 2016

(4)

Expected cohort size on 1st January 2016, adjusted by survival rate (5)

Estimated migrant stock

(6)

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

1980

40687

38893

0.899

0.939

23541

23918

1981

42210

40069

0.898

0.940

23967

23718

1982

42751

40507

0.907

0.944

24688

24345

1983

46594

44710

0.913

0.949

27008

26648

1984

46234

43403

0.914

0.949

27248

26325

1985

46366

44087

0.922

0.953

28119

27356

1986

48821

45905

0.931

0.960

29597

28611

1987

47190

44572

0.940

0.960

29024

28139

(2) x (3)

(5) - (4)

1988

45473

43095

0.938

0.964

28432

27922

1989

42212

40009

0.942

0.966

27743

26851

1990

39499

37586

0.949

0.969

26683

26120

1991

36946

35074

0.953

0.969

25162

24895

1992

35727

33927

0.949

0.971

25367

25234

1993

33975

32204

0.953

0.970

24352

24245

1994

32030

30055

0.953

0.968

23780

23593

1995

29044

27367

0.958

0.972

22216

21421

Source: NBS; Tiraspol Statistical Office; Penina et al., 2015

The applied method encounters a degree of error, given the use of survival rates of the period life tables. However, the studied generations are still in their youth and have been minimally exposed to the risk of death.

RESULTS

Figure 2 displays the estimated number of Moldovan migrants of the 1980–1995 cohorts during the last available period. Thus, in 2016, the estimated stock of migrants born in 1980–1995 constituted about 380 thousand, out of which 193.4 thousand were males, and 186.1 thousand were females. Gradually, the estimated stock of the corresponding cohorts in males and females increased to 406.3 thousand in 2017, 432.7 thousand in 2018, 452.0 thousand in 2019, and 464.3 thousand in 2020. The observed increase in migrant stock is merely due to the entry of young generations into the age of migration activity. In contrast, the older generations emphasise a stagnation in outmigration mobility. However, a slight decrease in the stock of Moldovan migrants was observed at the beginning of 2021 and 2022 years, corresponding with the period of migration restriction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The estimated stock of migrants emphasises a higher degree of male involvement in international migration compared with females in the analysed years. Nevertheless, the most significant gap in male/female migrant stock was observed within the 2017–2020 period, while it narrowed in 2021 and 2022.

Figure 2. The estimated stock of Moldovan migrants born in 1980–1995 as of 1st January 2016–2022, by sex

Source: NBS and Tiraspol Statistical Office

Among the studied cohorts, males and females (with a slight sex gap) registered a similar trend in changes in the stock of migrants during the 2016–2022 period. Generally, by 2016, the generations born in the early 1980s, to some extent, saturated their degree of involvement in international migration. The estimated stock of migrants of the 1980–1985 cohorts only slightly increased between 2016 and 2022, registering a decline in the last years (Table 2). To some extent, cohorts of the early 1980s are engaged in the process of the return migration, and their proportion in the overall stock of Moldovan migrants is slightly decreasing and likely will decline in the following years.

A significant stock of migrants in 2016 is also emphasised by the generations born in 1986–1991. However, compared with the generations born in 1980–1985, the 1986–1991 cohorts have shown a visible increase in migrant stock between 2016 and 2022 – the trend that could continue in the following years due to the high migration mobility in the young ages.

A notable increase in the 2016–2022 period in migrant stock is observed among the generations born in 1992–1995 that entered the active migration mobility ages in the period observed. However, compared to the 1980–1991 cohorts, the succeeding generations are less numerous, and a high degree of involvement in the outmigration of the population born after 1991 has a smaller impact on the changes in the migrant stock of the analysed cohorts.

Table 3 presents the proportion of Moldovan migrants of the 1980–1995 year of birth within the cohort size. Among the analysed generations, a visible disparity in the change of the cohorts’ sizes was emphasised due to the net migration of the population of the corresponding year of birth. Up to 2016, the generations born in 1980–1988 lost between 31–33% of the initial cohort size due to international migration. In the 2016–2022 period, the 1980–1988 cohorts registered a varied decline in their sizes because of international migration (between -2.1 and -6.9 percentage points in both sexes), where a higher loss in generations’ size was observed in younger ages. In the subsequent generations of the 1989–1991 years of birth, due to international migration, the cohorts’ size declined as 2016 by 27.2–28.5% in males and by 25.9–29.5% in females, and additionally reduced by 7.7–9.0 percentage points in males and by 7.7–9.3 percentage points in females in the 2016–2022 period. In 2016, the 1992–1995 cohorts emphasised the lowest decline in their size because of the net outmigration (between -18.9% and -23.9% in males and females), and, considering the high level of migration mobility of these ages, by 2022 the overall decline in the size of the corresponding cohorts constituted 31.3–33.3% in both sexes.

Table 2. The estimated stock of Moldovan migrants by year of birth as of 1st January 2016–2022, by sex


Year of birth

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022


Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

1980

13033

12609

13567

12892

14082

13285

14426

13566

14411

13810

14166

13795

13865

13680

1981

13957

13965

14476

14350

15079

14844

15388

15146

15469

15390

15276

15406

15044

15414

1982

14078

13893

14691

14317

15278

14661

15647

15036

15759

15305

15589

15290

15422

15255

1983

15537

15799

16223

16256

16995

16758

17452

17222

17543

17506

17315

17521

17019

17481

1984

15024

14868

15899

15294

16524

15812

16931

16333

17074

16691

16796

16674

16710

16717

1985

14643

14664

15687

15263

16523

15791

17034

16227

17277

16683

17092

16793

17009

16779

1986

15839

15435

16867

16054

17705

16682

18141

17178

18453

17655

18311

17777

18201

17909

1987

15315

14628

16290

15275

17329

15941

17907

16569

18044

17066

17993

17148

17946

17280

1988

14241

13634

15385

14527

16466

15229

17068

15858

17412

16403

17218

16466

17278

16577

1989

12022

11815

13200

12683

14371

13523

15089

14205

15461

14724

15386

14826

15283

14890

1990

10817

10308

11961

11168

13090

11970

13751

12672

14078

13223

13900

13319

13737

13427

1991

10062

9089

11296

10093

12683

10971

13352

11601

13762

12099

13702

12238

13373

12343

1992

8532

7714

9659

8712

10769

9587

11537

10367

11935

10994

11872

11110

11765

11232

1993

8012

6979

9148

8008

10312

8979

11302

9800

11766

10460

11724

10525

11589

10667

1994

6738

5499

7938

6486

9192

7524

10196

8513

10806

9195

10915

9471

10684

9560

1995

5599

5184

6631

5999

7778

6943

8625

7865

9213

8660

9323

8865

9103

9118

Source: NBS and Tiraspol Statistical Office



Table 3. The proportion of Moldovan migrants of the 1980–1995 year of birth within the cohort size as of 1st January 2016 and 2022, adjusted by survival rate, Moldova, by sex, %

Year of birth

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

1980

32.0

32.4

33.3

33.1

34.6

34.2

35.5

34.9

35.4

35.5

34.8

35.5

34.1

35.2

1981

33.1

34.9

34.3

35.8

35.7

37.0

36.5

37.8

36.6

38.4

36.2

38.4

35.6

38.5

1982

32.9

34.3

34.4

35.3

35.7

36.2

36.6

37.1

36.9

37.8

36.5

37.7

36.1

37.7

1983

33.3

35.3

34.8

36.4

36.5

37.5

37.5

38.5

37.7

39.2

37.2

39.2

36.5

39.1

1984

32.5

34.3

34.4

35.2

35.7

36.4

36.6

37.6

36.9

38.5

36.3

38.4

36.1

38.5

1985

31.6

33.3

33.8

34.6

35.6

35.8

36.7

36.8

37.3

37.8

36.9

38.1

36.7

38.1

1986

32.4

33.6

34.5

35.0

36.3

36.3

37.2

37.4

37.8

38.5

37.5

38.7

37.3

39.0

1987

32.5

32.8

34.5

34.3

36.7

35.8

37.9

37.2

38.2

38.3

38.1

38.5

38.0

38.8

1988

31.3

31.6

33.8

33.7

36.2

35.3

37.5

36.8

38.3

38.1

37.9

38.2

38.0

38.5

1989

28.5

29.5

31.3

31.7

34.0

33.8

35.7

35.5

36.6

36.8

36.4

37.1

36.2

37.2

1990

27.4

27.4

30.3

29.7

33.1

31.8

34.8

33.7

35.6

35.2

35.2

35.4

34.8

35.7

1991

27.2

25.9

30.6

28.8

34.3

31.3

36.1

33.1

37.2

34.5

37.1

34.9

36.2

35.2

1992

23.9

22.7

27.0

25.7

30.1

28.3

32.3

30.6

33.4

32.4

33.2

32.7

32.9

33.1

1993

23.6

21.7

26.9

24.9

30.4

27.9

33.3

30.4

34.6

32.5

34.5

32.7

34.1

33.1

1994

21.0

18.3

24.8

21.6

28.7

25.0

31.8

28.3

33.7

30.6

34.1

31.5

33.4

31.8

1995

19.3

18.9

22.8

21.9

26.8

25.4

29.7

28.7

31.7

31.6

32.1

32.4

31.3

33.3

Source: NBS and Tiraspol Statistical Office



DISCUSIONS

The estimated stock of Moldovan migrants for the 2016–2022 period represents the net result of the migration flows during the life course of the studied cohorts of the 1980–1995 year of birth. The size of the migrant stock merely depended on the initial cohort size, which shaped the dimension of the migration flows. Consequently, the generations born in the 1980s are numerical because of the large proportion of the reproductive-aged population of their parents, who realised their reproductive intentions in conditions of pro-natalist policies of that period. On the contrary, cohorts of the 1990s are less numerical due to the shift in the population structure that declined the number of the reproductive-aged population of their parents, accompanied by a period of social and economic disturbances.

Numerical cohorts are likely to experience intragenerational competition that serves as a push factor for international migration involvement, while the smaller generations have greater job market and social mobility opportunities (Hatton & Williamson, 2003; Clark et al., 2004; Zaiceva & Zimmermann, 2014). Of course, the impact of pull and push factors on migration flows depends on social, economic, and political factors that favour the opportunities in the countries of origin and destination.

Persons of the studied cohorts perhaps experienced emigration/immigration involvement as part of a family during childhood and as individuals by reaching adulthood. Thus, by presenting the paper’s results, we assume a possible early outmigration of the corresponding generations in the case of their parents’ involvement in the ethnic or labour migration of the 1980s and early 1990s. However, the majority of migrants are young adults, whose numbers decrease with age.

The accumulated stock of Moldovan migrants by 2016 corresponds with the long period of outmigration in Moldova, which mainly involved large cohorts of the young mobile population. Besides the initial size of the generations, on dimensions of migration flows influenced economic and legislative factors that allowed migrants to travel, work, and live in the destination countries.

For a certain period, Moldovan migrants were involved in a circular migration (Borodak & Tichit, 2014), which was primarily a solution for accumulating financial resources and improving living conditions. Ultimately, with the increase in the number of people who have obtained citizenship of one of the destination countries (EU, Russia, Israel, etc.), a change occurred from short-term and circular to long-term migration. Moreover, after a period of stay in destination countries, many Moldovan migrants have acquired second citizenship in states such as Canada, the USA, Italy, Portugal, etc. (Tabac, 2019).

The results of this paper distinguish the migration pattern between the cohorts studied, where each generation of males and females have a higher proportion of its initial size involved in international migration. This might be explained by the influence of multiple factors, such as study migration, reduction in travel costs, or widening of the migrant networks, that facilitate social and labour market integration. Additionally, the number of Moldovans with dual citizenship has increased significantly in recent years. Thus, for the young generation, an early outmigration perhaps becomes a life strategy.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a stagnation in Moldovan migrant stock was observed. This was primarily because of travel restrictions in most destination countries and, to a certain degree, due to return migration. The stagnation in the growth of migrant stock in the last years might also be a consequence of the entry of the early 1980s cohorts into ages with lower migration mobility. On the other hand, the generations born between 1990–1995 are less numerical and have a smaller migration capacity. Therefore, in subsequent years, due to the return migration of the 1980s cohorts, the migrants’ stock of the analysed generations might decrease.


CONCLUSIONS

This study estimates the Moldovan migrant stock of the 1980–1995 birth cohorts for the 2016–2022 period, for which an indirect method was used. Thus, the results show the cumulated number of migrants during the lifetime of the cohorts studied. Therefore, the presented estimation of the Moldovan migrant stock complements the existing studies on migration in Moldova.

The results emphasised a considerable involvement of the analysed cohorts in international migration, which contributed to an increase in the migrant stock. The main number of migrants from the studied cohorts are from numerous generations born in the 1980s. On the contrary, the less numerous generations born in the 1990s have a smaller proportion in the overall migrant stock of the 1980–1995 year of birth. A stagnation in the growth of the migrant stock of the studied cohorts was noticed during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, after removing all border-cross restrictions, no increase in the number of migrants born in 1980–1995 was observed, which can be explained by the exhaustion of the migration resources and the entry of numerical cohorts born in the early 1980s into ages with low migration mobility.

Even though a significant decline in the population of the 1980–1995 cohorts due to outmigration was observed, further optimistic scenarios may be considered. Thus, in the condition of a favourable environment, the registered losses in analysed birth cohorts could be compensated by the Moldovan returnees and long-term immigrants.

The method applied in migrant stock estimation might be further applied to other countries and regions by using vital statistics or census data.


REFERENCES

Abel, G. (2013). Estimating global migration flow tables using place of birth data. Demographic Research, 28, 505-546. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.18

Abel, G., & Cohen, J. (2019). Bilateral international migration flow estimates for 200 countries. Scientific Data, 6, PMID: 31209218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0089-3

Alho, J. (2008). Migration, fertility, and aging in stable populations. Demography, 45(3), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0021

Aude, B. (2017). Levels and patterns of internal migration in Europe: A cohort perspective. Population Studies, 71(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2017.1360932

Azose, J., & Raftery, A. (2018). Estimation of emigration, return migration, and transit migration between all pairs of countries. PNAS, 116(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722334116

Barsbai, T., Rapoport, H., Steinmayr, A., & Trebesch, C. (2017). The Effect of Labor Migration on the Diffusion of Democracy: Evidence from a Former Soviet Republic. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 36-69. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150517

Beer, J., Raymer, J., van der Erf, R., & van Wissen, L. (2010). Overcoming the problems of inconsistent international migration data: A new method applied to flows in Europe. European Journal of Population, 26(4), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-010-9220-z

Borodak, D., & Tichit, A. (2014). Should we stay or should we go? Irregular migration and duration of stay: The case of Moldovan migrants. Migration Studies, 2(3), 415-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnt016

CIVIS, & IASCI. (2010). Strengthening the Link between Migration and Development in Moldova. Chișinău. http://civis.md/Archive/CIVIS_IASCI_WB_Migration%20and%20development_report.pdf

Clark, X., Hatton, T., & Williamson, J. (2004). What Explains Emigration Out of Latin America? World Development, 32(11), 1871-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.06.011

Crivenco, A., & von Löwis, S. (2022). Shrinking Transnistria. Trends and Effects of Demographic Decline in a De Facto State. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 70(1), 47-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2021-0089

Dietz, B. (2000). German and Jewish migration from the former Soviet Union to Germany: Background, trends and implication. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(4), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/713680499

Gagauz, O. (2023). Recalcularea numărului populației Republicii Moldova, 2004-2014. Chişinău. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.2023.978-9975-147-86-6

Gagauz, O., Tabac, T., & Pahomii, I. (2023). Depopulation in Moldova: The main challenge in the context of extremely high emigration. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 21, 1-25. doi:10.1553/p-ke2z-76zz. https://austriaca.at/0xc1aa5576_0x003e2751.pdf

Görlich, D., & Trebesch, C. (2008). Seasonal Migration and Networks -Evidence on Moldova’s Labour Exodus. Review of World Economics, 144(1), 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0139-y. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/4282/1/562852557.pdf

Hatton, T., & Williamson, J. (2003). Demographic and Economic Pressure on Emigration out of Africa. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(3), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.t01-2-00008

Kashnitsky, I. (2020). Russian periphery is dying in movement: a cohort assessment of internal youth migration in Central Russia. GeoJournal, 85, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9953-5

National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. (n.d.). Statistical databank "Statbank". https://statistica.gov.md/en/banca-de-date-statistice-78.html

Penina, O., Jdanov, D., & Grigoriev, P. (2015). Producing reliable mortality estimates in the context of distorted population statistics: the case of Moldova. MPIDR Working Paper WP, 011, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2015-011. http://www.demogr.mpg.de/en/projects_publications/publications_1904/mpidr_working_papers/producing_reliable_mortality_estimates_in_the_context_of_distorted_population_statistics_the_case_5498.htm

Piracha, M., & Saraogi, A. (2012). The Determinants of Remittances: Evidence from Moldova. Oxford Development Studies, 40(4), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2012.729573

Raymer, J., Abel, G., & Smith, P. (2007). Combining census and registration data to estimate detailed elderly migration flows in England and Wales. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 170(4), 891-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00490.x

Rogers, A., & Castro, L. J. (1981). Model Migration Schedules. Research Report RR-81-30. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg, Austria. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/1543/1/RR-81-030.pdf

Tabac, T. (2019). Acquisition of foreign citizenship by Moldovan immigrants. Economy and Sociology, 2, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2019.2-09

Tabac, T. (2021). International migration and population changes in Moldova. Economy and Sociology, 2, 94-102. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2021.2-08

Tabac, T. (2021). Migrația populației. In: Gagauz, O., Buciuceanu-Vrabie, M., Pahomii, I., Ștîrba, V., Tabac, T., & Grigoraș, E. Populația Republicii Moldova la 30 de ani de independență: provocări principale și politici necesare (pp. 97-120). https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.ccd.2021.978-9975-89-248-3

Tabac, T., & Gagauz, O. (2020). Migration from Moldova: Trajectories and Implications for the Country of Origin. In: Denisenko, M., Strozza, S., & Light, M. (Eds.), Migration from the Newly Independent States. Societies and Political Orders in Transition (pp. 143-168). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36075-7_7

United Nations. (2020). International Migrant Stock 2020: methodology report. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2020_international_migrant_stock_documentation.pdf

Vieira, C. C., Fatehkia, M., Garimell, K., Werber, I., & Zagheni, E. (2022). Using Facebook and LinkedIn data to study international mobility. Data Science for Migration and Mobility, 141-158.

https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197267103.003.0007

Wilson, C., Sobotka, T., Williamson, L., & Boyle, P. (2013). Migration and Intergenerational Replacement in Europe. Population and Development Review, 39(1), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00576.x

Zagheni, E., Weber, I., & Gummadi, K. (2017). Leveraging Facebook's Advertising Platform to Monitor Stocks of Migrants. Population and Development Review, 43(4), 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12102

Zaiceva, A., & Zimmermann, K. (2014). Migration and the Demographic Shift. Discussion Paper, 8743, 1-71. https://docs.iza.org/dp8743.pdf