SOCIAL COHESION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: REALITIES AND PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2021.1-09Keywords:
social cohesion, social inclusion, social trust, solidarity.Abstract
Strengthening social cohesion is one of the main directions of the Moldova 2030 strategy. At the same time, the Association Agreement between the Republic of Moldova and the EU stipulates social inclusion, poverty reduction, social cohesion, sustainable development and improving the quality of life as social policy priorities. This article analyzes the theoretical approaches of the concept of social cohesion and presents the results of sociological research on social cohesion in the Republic of Moldova conducted in 2020. The sample includes 1202 respondents and is representative by place of residence (urban / rural), sex, age, level of education. The qualitative study included interviews with 90 experts, representatives of local public authorities, NGOs and the private sector and 3 focus groups. The research was carried out within the project “Training and strengthening social cohesion in the Republic of Moldova in the context of rapprochement with the European Union”. As key aspects of social cohesion were analyzed: self-identification of the degree of belonging of Moldovan citizens to the Republic of Moldova, perceptions of solidarity with other citizens, social trust, participation and inclusion of citizens in political, social and economic processes. The research results showed that the level of cohesion and social solidarity in the Republic of Moldova is quite low. The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened social distancing, uncertainty about the future, poverty and the marginalization of certain groups of the population and has further contributed to lowering the level of social cohesion.
Downloads
References
Babcicky, P., & Seebauer, S. (2020). Collective efficacy and natural hazards: Differing roles of social cohesion and task-specific efficacy in shaping risk and coping beliefs. Journal of Risk Research, 23(6), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1628096
Calo-Blanco, A., Kovářík, J., Mengel, F., & Romero, J. G. (2017). Natural disasters and indicators of social cohesion. PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0176885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176885
Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
Dimeglio, I., Janmaat, J. G., & Méhaut, P. (2012). Social Cohesion and the Labour Market: Societal Regimes of Civic Attitudes and Labour Market Regimes. Social Indicators Research, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0032-x
Green, A., & Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Regimes of Social Cohesion. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308633
Jenson, J., Réseaux canadiens de recherche en politiques publiques, Canada, & Développement des ressources humaines Canada. (1998). Les contours de la cohésion sociale: L’état de la recherche au Canada. Réseaux canadiens de recherche en politiques publiques.
Negură, P., Mocanu, V., & Potoroacă, M. (f.a.). Coeziunea socială în Republica Moldova din perspectiva apartenenței, încrederii și solidarității sociale (2016–2018). 27.
Noll, H.-H. (2009, decembrie 4). Indicators for Social Cohesion in the European Union.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). How’s Life?: Measuring Well-being. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). A Broken Social Elevator? How to Promote Social Mobility. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301085en
